Global Research, March 15, 2009
|
|
The top US military commander describes how Washington would engage Iran militarily amid simmering talks of war on the country. In a weekend interview with Charlie Rose, Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said although he is concerned with the ‘consequences’ of a military action against Iran, the army could rely on a ‘very strong strategic reserve’. “We have the capacity to do it but we are stretched. My ground forces are very stressed, very worn… On the other hand we’ve got a very strong strategic reserve in our Air Force and in our Navy and in fact that’s a part of the world, it’s a maritime part of the world, where the emphasis would certainly be on those two forces,” explained Adm. Mullen. His remarks come as Israeli Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi is currently in the US to discuss “the Iranian threat” with the heads of the defense establishment and the US Secretary of State’s special adviser for the Persian Gulf and Southwest Asia, Dennis Ross, according to Israeli media. The US and Israel accuse Iran, a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), of having military objectives in its pursuit of nuclear technology. While Israel repeatedly threatens to launch aerial strikes against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, the US — under the previous administration as well as the current one — warns that the use of military option remains on the table to retard the country’s nuclear program. As Western doubts linger over the success of any Israeli military plan against Iran as well as Tehran’s retaliation warnings, the US is expected to be involved — voluntarily or forcibly — in a potential war against Iran. Adm. Mullen argued that a war against Iran would set off “unintended” outcomes and endanger US interests in the oil-rich region. “What I worry about in terms of an attack on Iran is in addition to the immediate effect, the effect of the attack, it’s the unintended consequences,” Mullen said. “So I worry about the responses and I worry about it escalating in ways that we couldn’t predict.” “So that kind of option generates a much higher level of risk in terms of outcomes in the region and it really concerns me,” he added. Earlier reports suggested that Israel’s Prime Minister-designate, Benjamin Netanyahu, anticipates being involved in a “major military confrontation in the next few months”. Netanyahu is known as “Mr. Iran” in Israeli circles as he has long pledged to do “everything that is necessary” to stop the progress of Tehran’s nuclear program once and for all. Iran contends that its only goal is to make use of the civilian applications of the nuclear technology and has warned that it would not hesitate to take all necessary measures to defend its national interests. Meanwhile in the White House, President Barack Obama is believed to be drawing up plans to engage Iran in diplomacy over the disputed nuclear program. |
-
Search It!
-
Recent Entries
- Why Is Anyone Still Catholic?
- Pope Benedict XVI exposed in a monstrous international criminal cover-up: call to criminally prosecute Pope Benedict at the International Criminal Court
- An Act Of War: The US Congress is Actively Pushing for War on Iran
- VIDEO: “Nuclear Terrorism”: US administration is interested in creating an environment which will justify a possible nuclear attack on Iran
- Pope Benedict and the Roman Catholic Church: Worst Credibility Crisis Since Reformation
- Is Canada Fighting an Imperialist War in Afghanistan?
- The Politics of Counting Dead Afghan Civilians
- Hamid Karzai: Our Man in Kabul
- United States, once again, reserves the right to a “pre-emptive” nuclear attack because it owns the world?
- Obama Threatens Iran with Nuclear Weapons: Tehran’s Response.
-
Links
- Adbusters
- Alternet
- Art Crimes
- Arts and Letters Daily
- Artshole
- Asia Times
- C.O.A.T.-Coalition To Oppose The Arms Trade
- C.U.P.E.
- Canadian Charter of Rights
- Canadiandimension
- Confronting Empire
- Counterpunch
- Cyrano’s Online Journal
- Democracy Now
- Electronic Intifada
- Electronic Iraq
- Free Speech TV
- Gaza-Laboratory for the Occupation
- GLOBAL BDS MOVEMENT
- GlobalResearch.ca
- IMEMC
- Information Clearing House
- Informed Comment
- Killing Train
- Les Politiques
- Michael Albert
- Neo-Resistance
- Noam Chomsky
- NoMediaKings
- Open Democracy
- Palestine Blogs
- Palestine Chronicle
- Paulitics
- The Cutting Edge
- The Dominion
- The Tyee
- THomas Paine’s Corner
- TomDispatch
- Truthout/News Politics
- Vivelecanada
- WARCRIMINALSOUT
- we make money not art
- Woodslot
- World Changing
- Z Magazine
- ZNET
Advertisements
Adbusters writes in this month’s magazine:
LETS INSPECT DIMONA
For three decades Israel has refused to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect its highly secretive nuclear weapons facility at Dimona-in total defiance of UN Security Council resolutions. Israel has adamantly refused to participate in nuclear nonproliferation while demanding that other countries, most notably IRAN, do.
The way to a nuclear-free Middle East is to eradicate double standards. Isreal cannot threaten military action against Iranian nuclear facilities while demanding the right to maintain its own. The International community can no longer afford to allow Israel to act with impunity.
It’s time to reconcile policy in the Middle East. Israel must be held accountable.
Furthermore, let’s be clear that with American supplied military hardware/munitions and fundimg of Israel any acttion against Iran has full US complicity.